Memory corruption due to improper check to return error when user application requests memory allocation of a huge size in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables Qualcomm Multiple Chipsets Improper Input Validation Vulnerability Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. MikroTik RouterOS through 6.42 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files and remote authenticated attackers to write arbitrary files due to a directory traversal vulnerability in the WinBox interface.Īpache HTTP Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Ī crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. MikroTik Router OS Directory Traversal Vulnerability Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus before 11306, ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10530, and SupportCenter Plus before 11014 are vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Remote Code Execution ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus (SDP) / SupportCenter Plus RealTek Jungle SDK contains multiple memory corruption vulnerabilities which can allow an attacker to perform remote code execution. The Jboss Application Server, shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. Red Hat Jboss Application Server Remote Code Execution Zoho Desktop Central contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the Desktop Central MSP server.Īpache Log4j2 contains a vulnerability where JNDI features do not protect against attacker-controlled JNDI-related endpoints, allowing for remote code execution. Desktop Central Authentication Bypass Vulnerability Pi-hole Web v4.3.2 (aka AdminLTE) allows Remote Code Execution by privileged dashboard users via a crafted DHCP static lease.įortinet FortiOS "execute restore src-vis" downloads code without integrity checking, allowing an attacker to arbitrarily download files. Exploitation allows for remote code execution. Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager before 3.15.0 has an incorrect access control vulnerability. Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager Incorrect Access Control Vulnerability This vulnerability can only be exploited when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, allows attackers to perform remote code execution. Red Hat Linux JBoss Seam 2 Remote Code Execution Kernel/ptrace.c in Linux kernel mishandles contains an improper privilege management vulnerability which allows local users to obtain root access. Linux Kernel Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability Mongo-express before 0.54.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via endpoints that uses the `toBSON` method.Įmbedthis GoAhead before 3.6.5 allows remote code execution if CGI is enabled and a CGI program is dynamically linked. MongoDB mongo-express Remote Code Execution The optional Apache Solr module DataImportHandler contains a code injection vulnerability. Microsoft Windows AppX Installer contains a spoofing vulnerability which has a high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.įUEL CMS 1.4.7 allows SQL Injection via the col parameter to /pages/items, /permissions/items, or /navigation/items.Īpache Solr DataImportHandler Code Injection Vulnerability Microsoft Windows AppX Installer Spoofing Vulnerability Google Chromium V8 Engine contains a use-after-free vulnerability which can allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target system. I used "MaxLargeFileSize" and "WarnLargeFileSize".Google Chromium V8 Engine Use-After-Free Vulnerability TL DR - Yes, it works, just remove Policies from the path and find your version number of Outlook. Before we switched over to MS365 this past summer, we were using Outlook 2010 (which is 14.0 in the registry) and I went to several PC's with PST's getting close to 20GB and 2 that were exactly 20GB.(by the way, I have no idea if they were losing archived emails because I think they were at 20GB for a long time but Outlook wasn't throwing warnings to them!) Anyway, I monitored those PC's after implementing the registry key and they all started growing to 20.1, 20.2 etc. I did follow the instructions using the path posted in my previous comment and it worked. In my work environment, I don't have a single GP used for Outlook, which explains why this path didn't exist for me. After doing a little more research, I discovered the "Policies" in the path is relevant to Group Policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |